To me this is very simple to reconcile. "White" is a racial grouping roughly corresponding to people with overwhelmingly or solely European ancestors. Then there are White subraces, IE Germanics, Nordics, Celts, Slavs, and Mediterraneans. Then there are specific ethnicities within those subraces, so for the Germanics it would be Germans, Belgians, certain Frenchmen, Dutch, English, Americans, Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders, Boers. True Americans are Germanic, they are White, and they are of European descent but are not Europeans.
“The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength with the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies personal worth, contests the significance of folk and race, and thereby withdraws from mankind premise for its existence and culture.” ― Mein Kampf
Don't mind Clarence. He posts long copypasted replies on a number of Substacks with little to no relevance to the article he is posting under. They are usually based but non-sequiturs.
I enjoy your writings though disagree with you in major areas, one of which is your idea of Americanism which in reality died about 1920 in this country. Most Americans of European ancestry are of mixed ancestry. Very few are derived from one ethnic source outside of certain geographic regions. There are few ‘pure’ Anglo-Saxons,’ in the United States let alone in Britain, Canada, or Australia.
If you read article you see that I’m not a racial purist. Almost every American by my definition is going to be a mix of Euros. How could they be not? The genetic distance is also something not worth arguing over, watch survive the jive video on Anglo-Saxon.
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women,” drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
Some European populations have seen a refugia here in America. My father is almost pure Scots, I'm the first in over 250 of being here who doesn't have two Scots parents. All of my friends are pure Midwestern Germans.
On average we plot close to the north sea. But there are pockets of folks all over. We are not homogenous in terms of ethnicity and tribe.
I’m of English, Irish, and Southern Italian (Sicily&Naples) descent and my surname is English so am I an Anglo-Saxon??? By DNA or by “cultural” Anglo-Saxon
I am largely with you here; I too have given long thought to the question and think that the matter of race is better pursued in your terms. In a sense I see the opposite problem where I am. America is a clan or type that remains viable and might be spun into something more remarkable yet. The peoples of Britain, to my mind, have lost what made them worth reckoning, and only by abandoning the old bonds can a new people redeem themselves from the winnowing; there are yet good men and good families alive here, but they are not the product of the old nations, only promising molecules cast adrift on their last tired waves which must be collected into something purposeful.
Interesting to note that the French, despite being themselves caught up in a similar debate and living under a political system where race officially does not exist, still use the term Anglo-Saxon in common parlance. Usually in a derogatory way, on occasion to express frustration at the cleverness of those wily Anglo-Saxons who always seem to outdo them. But the concept has not been forgotten everywhere.
To me this is very simple to reconcile. "White" is a racial grouping roughly corresponding to people with overwhelmingly or solely European ancestors. Then there are White subraces, IE Germanics, Nordics, Celts, Slavs, and Mediterraneans. Then there are specific ethnicities within those subraces, so for the Germanics it would be Germans, Belgians, certain Frenchmen, Dutch, English, Americans, Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders, Boers. True Americans are Germanic, they are White, and they are of European descent but are not Europeans.
I will think on this one. I take a very ancient, here and now take on race.
Race is the tribe. Over time tribes become something else. Dorians became Spartans for example.
-
The Jewish doctrine of Marxism . . .
1. . . rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature
2 . . . denies personal worth
3 . . . contests the significance of folk and race
4 . . . withdraws from mankind premise for its existence and culture.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
“The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength with the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies personal worth, contests the significance of folk and race, and thereby withdraws from mankind premise for its existence and culture.” ― Mein Kampf
-
https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/138320669/deutsche-passion
What do this have to do with article?
Are you trying to imply I’m a jew marxist?
I'm 6'8" and squat a little over 600 lbs., I have SS tattooed on my neck.
Don't mind Clarence. He posts long copypasted replies on a number of Substacks with little to no relevance to the article he is posting under. They are usually based but non-sequiturs.
I enjoy your writings though disagree with you in major areas, one of which is your idea of Americanism which in reality died about 1920 in this country. Most Americans of European ancestry are of mixed ancestry. Very few are derived from one ethnic source outside of certain geographic regions. There are few ‘pure’ Anglo-Saxons,’ in the United States let alone in Britain, Canada, or Australia.
If you read article you see that I’m not a racial purist. Almost every American by my definition is going to be a mix of Euros. How could they be not? The genetic distance is also something not worth arguing over, watch survive the jive video on Anglo-Saxon.
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women,” drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
https://nordicresistancemovement.org/what-is-cultural-marxism/
Some European populations have seen a refugia here in America. My father is almost pure Scots, I'm the first in over 250 of being here who doesn't have two Scots parents. All of my friends are pure Midwestern Germans.
On average we plot close to the north sea. But there are pockets of folks all over. We are not homogenous in terms of ethnicity and tribe.
I’m of English, Irish, and Southern Italian (Sicily&Naples) descent and my surname is English so am I an Anglo-Saxon??? By DNA or by “cultural” Anglo-Saxon
I am largely with you here; I too have given long thought to the question and think that the matter of race is better pursued in your terms. In a sense I see the opposite problem where I am. America is a clan or type that remains viable and might be spun into something more remarkable yet. The peoples of Britain, to my mind, have lost what made them worth reckoning, and only by abandoning the old bonds can a new people redeem themselves from the winnowing; there are yet good men and good families alive here, but they are not the product of the old nations, only promising molecules cast adrift on their last tired waves which must be collected into something purposeful.
Nah, my forefathers have been here from the start and we never forgot who we were. We are Texan Scots. Gaels of the West.
We didn't magically become a new race just by moving here.
Interesting to note that the French, despite being themselves caught up in a similar debate and living under a political system where race officially does not exist, still use the term Anglo-Saxon in common parlance. Usually in a derogatory way, on occasion to express frustration at the cleverness of those wily Anglo-Saxons who always seem to outdo them. But the concept has not been forgotten everywhere.