Ok protests are one thing and demonstrations are another. Pulling off a succesful demonstration takes a organized and commited team. Its a good exercise and attracts other men who may not of heard of said brotherhood.
In the American Revolution you had powerful individuals like George Washington but also militias and activist groups like Sons of Liberty. You also have Germany and the NSDAP. I agree we need power and Ill buy your book but I wouldnt discount groups like PF.
I'm sure that I will dispute some things with you in the future, but you have demonstrated great spirit and diligent work; I want to read all of it before I make any contention. But we are walking in the same neck of the woods, and the last essay I wrote tracks to your ideas here, only with different emphases.
I agree with parts of this. Yes, if you lament the lack of nationalism in this country, you will not get what you want by moaning about how brown people are mean to you. That is not what winners do. To oppose the current ideology, people must acquire a certain level of intellectual competence to be able to compete. Academics are the basis from where policy derives, and clearly there is a bias in academics currently, so of course it leads policy a certain way. I also think it is important to look at who specifically is in control of media and why they do what they do. What I don't agree with, however, is this whole warrior notion. Yes, I think learning how to fight is important and has given me loads of self-assurance. But I'm not a crazy person who thinks I am fighting in war and that sparring is akin to killing a man. I know for a fact that you, the author, have not killed someone. You have not watched as you rip the life out of a man's body. Neither have I. Because we live in a civilized society and I am okay with that. Pretending that we live in the 5th century with the threat of Huns on our borders is just a veiled attempt at escapism. It only distracts you from the true means of change. You sleep on a mattress that you did not make and live in a house full of objects made by foreigners. Everyone who believes in this Kaczynski-ideology that we need to go back should go live in the forest and stop bothering the rest of us, because such an idea is a thousand times more impractical than anything else they could be doing. Anyways, I liked the article.
Ok protests are one thing and demonstrations are another. Pulling off a succesful demonstration takes a organized and commited team. Its a good exercise and attracts other men who may not of heard of said brotherhood.
That’s not what we’re interested in. We’re interested in wealth, power, and skills. Converts must be gatekeeped
So you would like to see our guys form groups, but not do activism?
Absolutely.
Activism is not how you win anything.
How are we going to win if we are not organized and aimed towards a common goal. I believe activism is part building that capability.
How are you going to win without power?
I’m not saying don’t organize. I’m advocating for warrior brotherhoods.
In the American Revolution you had powerful individuals like George Washington but also militias and activist groups like Sons of Liberty. You also have Germany and the NSDAP. I agree we need power and Ill buy your book but I wouldnt discount groups like PF.
I'm sure that I will dispute some things with you in the future, but you have demonstrated great spirit and diligent work; I want to read all of it before I make any contention. But we are walking in the same neck of the woods, and the last essay I wrote tracks to your ideas here, only with different emphases.
https://thejourneymansalmanac.substack.com/p/out-from-haran
Thanks for your work.
Also, Catholicism is based, paganism is gay
I agree with parts of this. Yes, if you lament the lack of nationalism in this country, you will not get what you want by moaning about how brown people are mean to you. That is not what winners do. To oppose the current ideology, people must acquire a certain level of intellectual competence to be able to compete. Academics are the basis from where policy derives, and clearly there is a bias in academics currently, so of course it leads policy a certain way. I also think it is important to look at who specifically is in control of media and why they do what they do. What I don't agree with, however, is this whole warrior notion. Yes, I think learning how to fight is important and has given me loads of self-assurance. But I'm not a crazy person who thinks I am fighting in war and that sparring is akin to killing a man. I know for a fact that you, the author, have not killed someone. You have not watched as you rip the life out of a man's body. Neither have I. Because we live in a civilized society and I am okay with that. Pretending that we live in the 5th century with the threat of Huns on our borders is just a veiled attempt at escapism. It only distracts you from the true means of change. You sleep on a mattress that you did not make and live in a house full of objects made by foreigners. Everyone who believes in this Kaczynski-ideology that we need to go back should go live in the forest and stop bothering the rest of us, because such an idea is a thousand times more impractical than anything else they could be doing. Anyways, I liked the article.