32 Comments

Speaking of War and Politics going hand in hand, it reminds me of that Mao quote, " Politics is war without bloodshed, while war is politics with bloodshed." I'm no Commie, but he was right there. Peace

Expand full comment

“150 years ago someone at a Catholic university wrote a doctoral thesis with the title: “Does a woman have a soul?” From this the whole tendency of Christianity emerges: it is directed at the absolute destruction of women and at emphasizing the inferiority of women. The entire substance of the priesthood and of the whole of Christianity is, I am firmly convinced, an erotic union of men (Männerbund) for the erection and maintenance of this 2,000-year old Bolshevism.

I reach that conclusion because I know very well the history of Christianity in Rome. I am of the conviction that the Roman emperors, who eradicated (ausrotteten) the first Christians, did exactly the same thing that we are doing with the communists. These Christians were then the worst yeast which the great city contained, the worst Jewish people, the worst Bolsheviks that there were.”

-

Heinrich Himmler on How Bolshevik Christianity Spreads Homosexuality and Hatred of Women... https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/138320669/heinrich-himmler-on-how-bolshevik-christianity-spreads-homosexuality-and-hatred-of-women

Expand full comment

I just want to say that Eastern Orthodox priests are allowed to be married if they were married before they became priests.

Expand full comment

“Oh how fond they are of the book of Esther, which is so beautifully attuned to their bloodthirsty, vengeful, murderous yearning and hope.” — Martin Luther

https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/oh-how-fond-they-are-of-the-book

Expand full comment

Haven't been enough evidence to suggest that there's no political solution? What you are advocating for is just to be another cog in the system, to be another tax payer or soldier who supports this nefarious system. That's not attacking it. I agree that fleeing to the rural zones and pretend nothing is happening is cowardly. You have two options basically :Full frontal attack or drop out. Nobody in their right mind thinks a full frontal attack is feasible, but dropping out, à lá Charles Manson, letting the system bleed while you take care of your own in a non conventional non bourgeoisie family is what I see as a viable alternative. Cheers.

Expand full comment

yes but then you’re at the full mercy of the regime.

You still need money, power, and skills and for most people that involves using the regime.

Expand full comment

In what the late Saddam Hussein once dubbed “the great Satan,” roughly two-thirds of the United States enlisted military corps is white . . .

The fat, bulbous, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin once confirmed in a 93-2 vote of the U.S. Senate, immediately embarked on a whirlwind media tour of duty, telling the pseudo-secular sycophants in the state-controlled tabloid press and state-controlled television talk show circuit about how the U.S. Army is full of bad racist white men.

Senior Defense Department leaders celebrating yet another Pride Month at the Pentagon sounding the alarm about the rising number of state laws they say target the LGBTQ+ community, warned the trend is hurting the feelings of the armed forces . . . “LGBTQ plus and other diverse communities are under attack, just because they are different. Hate for hate’s sake,” said Gil Cisneros, the Pentagon’s undersecretary for personnel and readiness, who also serves as DoD’s chief diversity and inclusion officer.

And now the U.S. Army is doing ads begging for more young white males?

What happened?

Even with a full-on declaration of war from Congress, and even if Gavin Newsome could be cheated into the Oval Office by ZOG somehow, while Globohomo diversity brigades go door-to-door looking to impress American children into military service, they will be met with armed, well-trained opposition, the invasion at the Southern border is going full tilt, and the drugs are flowing in like never before . . .

With the borders of Europe and the USA wide open, civil warfare within the USA, Britain, and most of Europe is a certainty if foreign wars are initiated. Nobody is going to fight a war for Biden, he is dumber than Bush . . . Nobody is going to fight a war for that kikesucking Zionist ass-whore Nikki Haley, and I mean nobody.

Get ready for it . . . the fat old devil worshipping fags on Capitol Hill, on Wall Street, in Whitehall, and in Brussels are in no shape to fight a war themselves, and most Americans are armed to the teeth with their own guns . . . NATO hates heterosexual white men . . . they said so themselves . . .

https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/138320669/nato-an-anti-white-and-anti-family-institution

Expand full comment

🔥🔥🔥🔥

Love the righteous rage pouring out from you :)

But don't underestimate the shit the government will get away with without the average system cog revolting as long as they have their cheap entertainment and basic necessities. It's not only in the US ,the whole world is waging war on White people. Revolutions are done by a minority of fanatics who pierce the veil of the illusion of power these illegitimate tyrants portray through a piece of paper, then the lemmings follow whoever feeds them. We all remember the abuse of the lock downs we endure in silence. But yeah ....they don't stand a chance .

Expand full comment

Like I said, get ready for it . . . the fat old devil worshipping fags on Capitol Hill, on Wall Street, in Whitehall, and in Brussels are in no shape to fight a war themselves, and most Americans are armed to the teeth with their own guns . . .

Nobody is going to fight a war for NATO, they are finished.

Expand full comment

Outstanding, BD. Thomas Jefferson said the 2nd Amendment insures the other nine. That is why it is so relentlessly attacked by our enemies. The American forefathers were well educated in the true sense, many of them able to read Greek & Latin, physically fit, knowledgeable about farming, proficient with firearms and a plethora of tools. Totally unlike the imbecilic, boot licking, pussy, fagot, bulldyke, tranny, scumbag politicians we are cursed with today. The commanders of the Roman legions willingly sacrificed their lives to their gods in battle in exchange for victory. Nothing like the candy assed bureaucrats in uniform that infect the nations of the west now. Legend has it that a certain tribe of Greeks sailed across the Adriatic sea so many centuries ago and founded Rome. As many philologists posit that Latin, the language of Rome, is derived from ancient Greek, the contention has credibility. War is an extension of politics by the most radical means. In truth, war is the father of us all. Aryans, overwhelmingly outnumbered and out gunned by a vicious enemy seeking our complete annihilation must resort to asymmetrical, guerrilla, leaderless resistance warfare, asking no quarter and giving none. Only by the path of the lone wolf, working in conjunction with countless others covertly seeking the same end, will we seize and maintain the reigns of state power and regain control of our destiny.

Expand full comment

Absolutely, as Junger said, “the decision between war and peace is the highest sovereign prerogative” and that isn’t happening if you aren’t armed.

Expand full comment

Brilliant. Totally agree

Expand full comment

Thank you, Robert. Best Regards & 88!

Expand full comment

88 Brother! 🙏

Expand full comment

Always a pleasure to meet a Brother Aryan who can see through the obfuscation of Talmudic lies and knows the truth, especially about A.H. & National Socialism, which has absolutely nothing at all to do with so-called, "Nazis", a Jew created term of denigration. Robert, if you are not familiar with the incredible works of the incomparable, Miguel Serrano, I suggest you seriously check them out, particularly, "Adolph Hitler, The Ultimate Avatar", perhaps the most important tome ever penned. 88, Bro!

Expand full comment

The pleasure is all mine brother. Yes I'm familiar with Serranos work, I appreciate the suggestion, I can see you have good taste

I would suggest Savitri but by your reply I have a feeling I don't have to :) Cheers brother

Expand full comment

Thank you, Robert. "The Lightning and the Sun" is one of my favorite books of all time. I read it many years ago and subsequently bought all of her great work. If you are not familiar with her, I recommend you check out, Thea-sophy. An amazing, Hyperborean, Aryan gal. She has some articles on substack and videos on YouTube (JewTube). I'm surprised they haven't scrubbed her account there. She is brilliant and drop-dead gorgeous as well. Cheers & 88! to you, Brother. Stay Strong & Sinn Fein.

Expand full comment

Don Rumsfeld was right when he said, "Europe has shifted on its axis," it was the wrong side that won World War II, and it becomes clearer every day . . .

What has NATO done to defend Europe?

Absolutely nothing.

My enemies are not in Moscow, Damascus, Tehran, Riyadh or some ethereal Teutonic bogeyman, my enemies are in Washington, Brussels and Tel Aviv.

Heil Hitler.

https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/pardonne-mon-francais-va-te-faire

Expand full comment

You are correct, Clarence but fuck Rumsfeld. He is scum and deserves a rope around his neck like ALL the rest of them.

Expand full comment

I have SS tattooed on my neck.

Rumsfeld was a German, and he was a soldier . . . he went to Iraq and met with Saddam Hussein . . . alone, and unarmed . . .

Tell me that didn't take some testicular fortitude.

Saddam Hussein and his sons were pieces of shit who deserved their ends.

Expand full comment

The Iraqis were never a threat to the U.S. "Israel West" destroyed Iraq at the behest of its' master, "Israel East". By that criteria, the president, his cabinet, the complete congress and the judiciary all deserve those ends. It was Rumsfeld who so nonchalantly stated that the Pentagon couldn't account for over 3 trillion dollars. If you believe that, I've got some prime swampland to sell you.

Expand full comment

So, Rumsfeld wasn't wrong . . .

Expand full comment

It would indeed be folly for all RW able young men to flee elite higher ed, the military and the corporate world there are certainly paths to certain amounts of wealth, power, and influence through the trades and blue collar entrepreneurship. This means not just being a wrench turner for long but working your way to ownership and expansion of your business. Bye midlife you could have a large personal income even more in hard tangible productive property and assets especially valuable in a world where less and les people have these assets and the skills to deploy them to keep the gears of our nation turning. You will also be a patron to the young able men working for you and in turn you should be a client of RW men who operate larger businesses or are influential in their corporation or government bureaucracy. You can also be very influential in local politics taking this route. Maybe this is all cope on my part as it’s the route I have taken but I feel that was the path best suited to my disposition and circumstances.

Expand full comment

Only if you manage to create a parallel economy. However I have a feeling that the State isn't going to be kind to one. WACO comes to mind. Hereticdrummer is right. The only option is assimetrycal warfare. I'm not used to comment in substack so I don't know what's off the limits or not. Trust me... The higher you reach the more corrupt you'll be if you're still operating under your tyrant's rules.

Expand full comment

“The 2nd Amendment exists so fathers could teach their sons marksmanship both for hunting and for fighting off Indian raids”.

True, however no Indians were present at Lexington or Concord, at least none who tried to confiscate powder, balls, locks, stocks, or barrels. Must been more behind 2A being the second amendment before the ratification of the Constitution.

Expand full comment

yes but that isn’t the origin why the 2nd amendment was necessary. Besides it being necessary for natural law, the Brits were just trying to take back sovereignty without understanding that it would leave the colonists open to attac and starvation

Expand full comment

the last argument of kings. violence settles everything. point being 2a was specific to the writers’ understanding of human behavior in the name of government power, specifically when government power is directed against the population which established the government. context slightly different, but certainly not mutually exclusive.

rome’s power derived from its legions which were kept outside of rome (except the praetorian) to thwart overthrows. our colonial governments understood the need to arm on the inside to keep unwanted government power in check.

security certainly being necessary. french, british, and their indian allies. the first two fading as security threats after 1815.

Expand full comment

no more jews = no more wars

Expand full comment

I have now read at least almost all of your work here, so this thread is as good as any to start some friendly dissent. I like your comparisons, but I think the applications in this essay point in the wrong direction. We should abandon the conventional public world and established institutions as me may, not as an act of complacency or retreat, but as a rational compaction of force. To my mind there is no battle to be won through politics and the institutions; perhaps no battle worth winning. We should not "drop out" into a trade over a degree, we should genuinely prefer it as real and potent. The advantages offered by military training are available to most men under their own volition in the ways that count, and make proof of men if they can undergo the rigours of training without the impetus of institutional necessity. This society's architecture is not a fort to win but a leaning wall which we don't want to be standing under, or a cesspit we don't want to breathe. The legions may not have retreated from men, but I'm sure they didn't wade deeper and deeper into swamps. I think that our fight is out from the tangle of modern ruin, and so far as we fight metaphorical battles now it is not a test of how far we can succeed within the prison but how we can shatter its walls and maintain ourselves beyond them, even if this is a doomed cause. We overestimate our CURRENT strength (of force and character) and misconstrue our aims to think that we can or should win into this ruin. We win out of it to a place where we can make ourselves beloved again to the gods, then join what comes after. Thanks for your work.

Expand full comment

If your a waiting for the fall enjoyer, you do yourself a disservice by backing out. Our people collectively aren’t doing what it takes to survive post-collapse.

Yes, you can get training and learn things outside of the institutions— but very few make the money necessary to do take full advantage.

Backing out is giving up. You might be stepping aside but the enemy still has his sights on you.

Expand full comment

As luck would have it, Dave Green just wrote an essay that conveys something like what I mean. I know this is a different model with different priorities to what you are promoting, but in terms of practical grouping, independence and efficacy it makes very good points with a few strong examples. In terms of vision I probably lean more toward your ideas, but he is doing an excellent job of laying out the kind of praxis we need to make a start.

Expand full comment

Points taken, but I am not suggesting a waiting strategy, and I'm not even very confident in an approaching collapse. But I think that it is a better course to regroup our strength and skill to be as free as possible from the entanglements of the system, even if that means foregoing some real tactical advantages for the meanwhile. I believe that a genius of invention can suffice to develop means of our own to match and even outmatch what the institutions offer, and in fact I think this is much truer for Americans who still yet often possess the material and cultural material to make exceptional, sovereign outposts for themselves. I appreciate that this sounds a bit abstract and airy. I hope to enlarge upon these ideas in writing sometime soon, but in the meanwhile I think that the enemy has sights on us anyway; expressing our efforts in their own haunts only makes us easier targets individually as easier to read strategically.

Expand full comment