5 Comments

The opening lines talk about "countless" Achaeans dying for the sake of Achilles' anger. This is an expression of aristocratic morality in which the quantity of individuals does NOT matter but only the quality of the individuals involved. As you rightly say, the notion that one man could be worth more than thousands is very difficult for most to even consider.

Expand full comment

Thanks for inspiring me to reread the Iliad. But as I recall, wasn't one of the central points of dispute between Agamemnon and Achilles over the apportioning of women captives as spoils of war? And Achilles was certainly placing his own interests first in refusing to fight because of the affront he suffered. Wasn't that point of honor also a quarrel over loot?

Subscribed, and looking forward to more such interesting pieces.

Expand full comment

Gilgamesh is great, but it’s separate from the Iliad.

I think Homer’s Contest by Nietzsche is good intro to the Greks.

For me, BAM helped me understand it more as well.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Apr 17
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Apr 17
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

OR read Nietzsche to prime yourself for Gilgamesh to prime yourself for Homer to prime yourself for the Mahabharata, followed by the Volsunga Saga and then the Beowulf to prime yourself for the Kalevala (you know, just in case some Indo-European archaism survived in Finno-Ugric Oral Tradition)

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Apr 17
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

yes I like Gilgamesh but don’t know much about the translations

Expand full comment